- Gramatica de la Lengua Castellana – 1821
- Gramática de la Lengua Castellana – 1796
- Ortografía de la lengua castellana – 1792
{ 0 comments }
Sintaxis
- AGLE: Archivo Gramatical de la Lengua Española de Salvador Fernández Ramírez
- SHEEHAN DISSERTATION: EPP and Null Subjects in Romance
{ 0 comments }
Mis enlaces de 2007-07-1 a 2007-07-3:
- Andrés Pablo Salanova
- Luisa Martí’s research
- La Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos (UDHR) en Unicode
{ 0 comments }
Un trabajo escrito en colaboración con Isabel Pérez Jiménez en el que se investiga el carácter sintáctico de una parcela del lexicón, en particular la clase de verbos que denotan realizaciones graduales.
¿Son todos los verbos inacusativos aspectualmente atélicos en español? El papel de la telicidad en la interficie léxico-sintaxis. Norberto Moreno Quibén and Isabel Pérez Jiménez, (2005)
@INCOLLECTION{Moreno2005,
author = {Moreno Quibén, Norberto and Pérez Jiménez, Isabel},
title = {¿Son todos los verbos inacusativos aspectualmente atélicos en español? El papel de la telicidad en la interficie léxico-sintaxis},
booktitle = {Actas del VI Congreso de Lingüística General},
publisher = {Arco Libros},
year = {2005},
pages = {508–520},
address = {Madrid}
}
{ 0 comments }
En este trabajo escrito en colaboración con Isabel Pérez Jiménez se defiende la interpretación referencial de algunos SSNN escuetos (referential bare plurals) por influencia de la estructura informativa de la cláusula.
On the Referential Status of Bare Plurals. Norberto Moreno Quibén and Isabel Pérez Jiménez, (2004).
@INCOLLECTION{Moreno2004,
author = {Moreno Quibén, Norberto and Pérez Jiménez, Isabel},
title = {On the Referential Status of Bare Plurals},
booktitle = {University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics – Cranberry Linguistics 2},
publisher = {UConn. Department of Linguistics},
year = {2004},
volume = {12},
pages = {39–43}
}
{ 0 comments }
Un trabajo escrito en colaboración con Juan Romero sobre la teoría del Ligamiento (Binding Theory) y algunas cuestiones sobre su encaje en el Programa Minimalista.
A/A-bar movement and Attract-f. Norberto Moreno Quibén and Juan Romero (2001).
@INCOLLECTION{Moreno2001,
author = {Moreno Quibén, Norberto and Juan Romero},
title = {A/A-bar movement and Attract-f},
booktitle = {The Minimalist Parameter},
publisher = {John Benjamins},
editor = {Galina Alexandrova},
year = {2001}
}
{ 0 comments }
Crítica de los argumentos a favor de la excepcionalidad del Pirahã con respecto a la Gramática Universal.
{ 0 comments }
Este es un antiguo trabajo escrito en colaboración con Juan Romero. En On the syntax of locatio and locatum verbs pretendemos defender la aproximación sintáctica a la construcción del lexicón frente a las críticas lexicalistas representadas en su momento por Kiparsky (“Remarks on Denominal Verbs”, in A. Alsina, J. Bresnan & P. Sells (eds.), Complex Predicates, 1997) y Fodor y Lepore (Linguistic Inquiry 1998, Vol. 29, No. 2, Pages 269-288).
On the syntax of locatio and locatum verbs. Norberto Moreno Quibén and Juan Romero, (2000).
@ARTICLE{Moreno2000,
author = {Moreno Quibén, Norberto and Juan Romero},
title = {On the syntax of locatio and locatum verbs},
journal = {Cuadernos de Lingüísica del IUOG},
year = {2000},
volume = {7},
pages = {145–155}
}
{ 0 comments }
Language Log: Awwa, meh, feh, heh
Recientemente una amiga se preguntaba por la gramática de la interjección a causa del análisis de una oración en el instituto del hijo de una compañera. Esta entrada del Language Log viene en su ayuda, aunque me parece que en el Instituto no les va a gustar la propuesta.
John Lawler tiene un pequeño texto sobre la interjección “the hell” que puede ser útil en este sentido.
{ 0 comments }
Workshop on Argument Structrure and Syntactic Relations
Congreso sobre Estructura Argumental en el País Vasco. Además del interés científico, Vitoria en mayo es una ciudad muy agradable.
Call Deadline: February 23, 2007
Workshop on Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations
Various issues emerge from looking at the broad theme of argument structure in grammar: the role and the nature of thematic hierarchy, the relation between Case and configurationality, the relation between argument structure, case and agreement, ergativity, the structure of the VP/vP, internal aspect, etc. In other words, the ‘lower’ part of the syntax is probably the one of which we have the most unclear understanding and important discrepancies in the literature of the last years constitute evidence of that. There are quite a lot of theoretical questions concerning the architecture of the verbal domain and these questions need to be answered. Some of the questions are the following: do we need more than vP and VP, like VoiceP, ApplP, CausP, AktP, PathP, EventP etc.? Is there anything like UTAH in syntax, or do we need a more elaborate understanding of thematic roles? How should the operation Agree be defined, and which features are necessary for the description of argument structure? How is morphological case related to argument structure?, and many more.
To discuss the recent developments of morphology-syntax-semantics articulation in the VP-domain, scholars working on different aspects are invited to share their results in a 3-day workshop and discuss the current state of affairs in this field. Also, a special focus will be put on the Basque language and its implication on the topic of this workshop, argument structure. Two of our local invited speakers will contribute to this debate on Basque, which will give us a more complete general scenario of the argument structure cross-linguistically.
This Workshop on Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations will take place at the University of The Basque Country from May 23-25, 2007 at Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain. There are 12 slots of 40 minutes for selected talks. The workshop will also feature six invited speakers.
- John Bowers (Cornell University)
- Gillian Ramchand (University of Tromsø)
- Hamida Demirdache (University of Nantes)
- Jaume Mateu (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)
- Javier Ormazabal (University of the Basque Country)
- Beñat Oyharçabal (IKER-CNRS)
——————————————————————
We welcome submission of up to 3 page abstracts, anonymous, PDF-format, 12pt font, one column, references and examples included, on any topic related to argument structure.
Please send your abstracts to argumentstructure@yahoo.com with ”Abstract” in the header of the message. The deadline for abstract submission is February 23. Notification will be late March.
{ 0 comments }
