Filosofía

wo’s weblog: Modal knowledge, counterfactuals and counterpossibles

Discusión acerca de si el conocimiento modal está basado en premisas contrafácticas. Básicamente, si es posible reducir la semántica de la modalidad (conocida pero no exenta de problemas) a la semántica de los condicionales irreales o contrafácticos.

.

{ 0 comments }

Virtual philosopher: More on The Protestant Work Ethic Fallacy

{ 0 comments }

Kurt Gödel (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).

Un lugar en el que los lectores del libro de Rebeca Goldstein Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel podemos profundizar en las cuestiones lógicas y metamatemáticas que preocuparon a Gödel.

{ 0 comments }

Enlaces 2007-02-12

2007-02-12

{ 0 comments }

Noamchomsky_2

Noam Chomsky
Boston
29 May 1990

A number of the leading questions in Philosophy can, I think, be profitably formulated and addressed from a naturalistic perspective that derives in thrust, if not in content, from the early modern period. That has been my primary interest, particularly as regards topics concerning language and mind, the biological roots of human understanding and language as a modality for expression of thought.

© Steve Pyke Philosophers (1993)

{ 0 comments }